Local

SAF, CCRKBA Ask Supreme Court to Reconsider in Challenge to Maryland Gun Ban

The Second Amendment and the Citizens Committee on the Right to Keep and Bear a Weapon have petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to reconsider their challenge to Maryland’s ban on semi-automatic rifles. modern motion.

Participation SAF and CCRKBA are Field Traders, LLC, Firearms Policy Coalition and three private citizens, Micah Schaefer, David Snope and Dominic Banchi, who have named the incident.

The case is Bianchi v Frosh. Plaintiffs are represented by attorneys David H. Thompson, Peter A. Patterson and John D. Ohlendorf with Cooper & Kirk, PLLC in Washington, DC, Raymond M. DiGuiseppe at DiGuiseppe Law Firm, PC in Southport, NC and Adam Kraut, FPC in Sacramento, California. Can read the summary here.

As detailed in the 39-page summary, various circuits have backed such bans by using the funds to “a bag of special constitutional tests, varying from circuit to circuit.” “, with Maryland’s ban representing “perhaps the harshest test created to date.”

The summary goes on to explain, “Maryland’s ban… is only for particular dislike, not of a recognized firearm, but for certain features found on certain firearms. That makes Maryland’s law particularly illogical, since most of the features it prohibits actually serve to make the guns they’re included in. safer. ”

A few lines later, people succinctly commented, “Truth, the odd weapon that Maryland calls an ‘offensive weapon’ is mechanically identical to any other semi-automatic — the weapons undisputed, wildly popular, and fully Protected by the Second Amendment. ”

The 2008 Heller case asserted that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to keep and bear arms.

“We are pursuing this case because the Supreme Court has long since ended legal gymnastics that were used to maintain unconstitutional levels of the semi-automatic gun ban,” said SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan Gottlieb said . “Lower courts have upheld such injunctions based on whatever logic they can come up with to justify their decisions. The Second Amendment is not going away, and questions about what weapons are protected need to be answered. You can’t allow guns to be banned based on their cosmetics or color.”

Payment procedures Tampafp.com because the Politics, Local news about the Tampa . area, Sports, and Country title. Support the press by Click here for our GoFundMe or subscribe to us free newsetter by clicking here.

Android users, Click here to download the free press app And never miss a story. It’s free and will be coming to Apple users soon.

https://www.tampafp.com/saf-ccrkba-ask-supreme-court-review-in-challenge-to-maryland-gun-ban/ SAF, CCRKBA Ask Supreme Court to Reconsider in Challenge to Maryland Gun Ban

DUSTIN JONES

USTimeToday is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – admin@ustimetoday.com. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Related Articles

Back to top button