Imagine this reviewer sitting across from you, reaching out to offer one of the two or choices that have sparked the imaginations of millions over the past 22 years.
As the scenario applies to “Matrix Recovery“the question is not about a red “truth” pill or a blue capsule containing beautiful liesor whether the movie is good or bad, or whether it claims to be watched or skipped.
The script puts it succinctly: choice is an illusion. You already know what you’re going to do. You may even have committed to an enthusiastic opinion about the movie without being able to see it. Brand “Matrix” have any effect on humans.
It can be said that the film is more successful in some of its goals than others, and feels more necessary. One-two punch of 2003 belong to “Reload Matrix” and “Matrix Revolutions.“However, it ended up falling into the same design flaws that made them perform worse.
TL version; The DR of this review is: “The Matrix Resurrections” is a better cultural messenger and analyzer than a cinematic spectacle – playing with enough lofty concepts to be interesting, while still lacking exaggeration.
However, I appreciate that Lana Wachowski defied all odds to see the world of the “Matrix”, or ours, in binary. Existence, in the world of the “Matrix”, is rarely defined so simply, which is why my initial distaste for it softened upon closer examination. It may not deliver the thrill of the original, but it will at least start some conversation.
It’s up to you to decide if that will be enough to lure you to the cinema in 2021.
When it was released in 1999, “Matrix“is an awe-inspiring, paradigm-shifting action allegory that brings all the explosiveness and scope of a space opera not only to Earth, but to its cities and office spaces.” It gives us a glossy fantasy mixed with mysticism, posing that the toxic corporate system of capitalism is a massive multiplayer role-playing segment built to enslave We and machines are made by machines.
Then it brought up the guns – lots of guns – used by freedom fighters like Trinity (Carrie-Anne Moss) and Morpheus (played in Laurence Fishburne’s original trilogy), who the definitions of The laws of physics no longer fully apply. Characters preach about freeing the mind, run up walls, jump between skyscrapers, and perform gymnastic feats while carrying weights of firecrackers and wearing heavy leather and rubber gear.
Most importantly, the Wachowskis cast Keanu Reeves as a closet computer programmer – aka nerd – whose journey turns him into a superhero. What if you don’t love?
Throw away the technocrats and dreamy philosophy, all the gears and mechanics, and you’re left with the simple reminder that this is an eternal love story – with Neo and Trinity find and lose each other over and over again.
Since the original movie came out, countless newer films have brought us their own versions of moody, fate-bonded love affairs. Likewise, you’ve certainly seen other versions of its action sequence. The groundbreaking effects and combat choreography in “The Matrix” set a new standard in entertainment, around movies, TV shows and, of course, video games. Now, even the cinematic technology behind Time bullet became quotidian.
In the second half of “The Matrix Resurrections,” these influences become an important obstacle to its creative dynamics. However, the film is full of interesting anti-text about its legacy that makes great.
Here and now, whenever that’s the case, Neo reappears in the limited everyone identity of Thomas Anderson, a man caught up in his own sleep-wake-making loop of existence. .
Like many of us, Mr. Anderson overdoses on drugs and doesn’t connect enough with reality, despite being fundamentally better than most. He’s gone out of his monkey status to become a programming god at his old company MetaCortex, where he’s teamed up with a sleek suit called Smith (Jonathan Groff, infuses of a curator feel. all his “Hamilton” surveys, but less spitting). However, he is not content, feeling that despite his popularity and success, something is wrong.
And what are Thomas Anderson’s outstanding achievements, “Halo”, his “Minecraft”? A game called “The Matrix”.
Reeves’ hero has been proclaimed by a variety of constituencies, from discerning outsiders to office drones, tech pundits have cited Jean Baudrillard to push push and of course, Trump devotees.
When it comes to enduring art, what makes it so globally celebrated is also open to endless explanations. Although Lana Wachowski and her sister Lilly (who was not involved in this film) designed “The Matrix” as an allegory for accepting one’s transgender identity, the filmmakers also know that the literature The dominant chemistry of 1999 would never allow the story to be made public. that. The smoldering malice of corporate hegemony backed by technology is much more involved.
But because Neo’s awakening to her true self has been claimed by disinformation peddlers and violent misogynists, Lana Wachowski and her co-authors David Mitchell and Aleksandar Hemon was forced to answer about that. (Lilly said her part on Twitter in May 2020, and it gave us life.) That they do, mischievously at first before showing their fangs later.
When Neo reconnects with Trinity, she’ll go with Tiffany, a settled suburban mother with a destructive husband named – ha! – Chad.
This is the point where I am forced to say as much as you need to know about the story to maintain the surprise of all. But, seriously. Look at the fact that Neo/Thomas Anderson is back, as if his death didn’t end the machine wars in “Revolutions.” Or Morpheus is back and is now played by Yahya Abdul-Mateen II – but so is Niobe, and she’s still being played by Jada Pinkett Smith.
New characters like Jessica Henwick’s Bugs refresh the premise, along with other much-needed tech upgrades. Since no one uses landlines anymore, the rebels have found other ways to get in and out of the system, which has evolved to capture them more effectively. Other details are intentionally reminiscent of the first trilogy, such as Priyanka Chopra Jonas’ Sati, a role featured in “Revolutions”; and one of several returning characters, including a beautiful black cat that hints at deja vu.
To perform the strip another property owes its legacy to this oneThe whole purpose of “Resurrections” is to remind the audience to never stop questioning the nature of their reality, including what fictions like this tell you to be true.
“Resurrections” at its best escalates the urgency of checking corporate control so that those in power do the work to turn ideas into dangerous goods. And, it critiques the means by which emotion is used to destroy the value of the fact.
Want to compile daily all the news and commentary that Salon has to offer? Sign up for our morning newsletterCrash Course.
Wachowski and her co-creators acknowledge the role of “The Matrix” legend in that effort, ostensibly in an early action sequence that connects scenes from a brainstorming session in Neo’s group with frames. Pictures from his personal life.
As each programmer understood some of the Reddit board interpretations of “The Matrix,” Reeves’ hero tauntedly bit into a bloody delicious steak of ignorant bliss. Or he is anxious to take the medicine prescribed for him by his analytic physician (Neil Patrick Harris); Can you guess what color the pills are? A dialogue exchange implies that the audience is in The Matrix with them. Meanwhile, they went back to saying, “What made ‘The Matrix’ different? It got you excited.”
We get it: The Wachowskis suggested The Matrix. The multi-headed monster of capitalism has realized its core aspects, and consumers have mapped it to represent whatever they need.
But most audiences don’t go to the movies to see the polemics against disinformation peddlers and neo-Nazis. They wanted to blow their mind again, and in a different way, with visuals that elevate the original’s aesthetic to the next level.
That sets a high expectation on “Revival” which it does not exceed or fully meet. In a similar way, “Reloaded” and Revolutions “are shaped by Agent Smith’s greedy credo about more and more, always moreThe nitro-enhanced battles overwhelm the end of the story, paralyzing its frenetic climax to a climax that’s more conceptually satisfying than its emotional one. Once the gun is drawn and the fists start to fly, this installment returns to the franchise’s old habit of sliding on a carpet of used cartridges.
Overload isn’t the only means by which “The Matrix Resurrections” can’t stop itself from becoming an ouroboros in pop culture. Every action scene is reminiscent of a recent movie that conveys something from the original trilogy. When a character wonders, “I’ve never seen anything like this before,” you should be forgiven for thinking, “Oh, I have.” Each zombie carnageeach Marvel Cinematic Universe or DC Comics superhero team team upeach “John Wick” punch-a-thon removed what “Easter” served and had more fanfare.
That’s the challenge of creating a popular myth, isn’t it? Any product that comes out after the original is more likely to fall victim to its popularity than reset the bar. Perhaps this chapter is about grabbing the nostalgia we ascribe to these stories with our shoulders and shaking it around, as if to scream, “Wake up.”
Then again, since the whole point of the story is that our brains get so caught up in what this system has been feeding it for years, frustration gets into the game. And what is frustration, if not a good-bad binary breaking state? Like “The Matrix Resurrections,” it’s about the hard-to-reach itch between unqualified success and sheer failure. Neither and both are worth your thinking.
Believe me, or not. You will only have to see for yourself.
“The Matrix Resurrections” is showing in theaters now and is available for a limited time on HBO Max.
Other stories you may like:
https://www.salon.com/2021/12/22/no-one-can-say-if-the-matrix-resurrections-is-good-or-bad-either-way-it-makes-you-think/ No one can say “The Matrix Resurrections” is good or bad. Either way, it makes you think