Line 5: Enbridge seeks to decide oil pipeline lawsuit in US federal court

On Wednesday, Enbridge moved to federal court a lawsuit in Michigan seeking to shut down an oil pipeline that runs beneath a canal connecting two of the Great Lakes.

The company argues that the 2019 lawsuit filed by Attorney General Dana Nessel in state court should be taken by US judge Janet Neff, who last month retained jurisdiction over a separate lawsuit brought by Enbridge initiative to keep the oil flowing through their Fifth Street.

Spokesman Ryan Duffy said: “We hope that the attorney general will agree that it is more reasonable for her case and Enbridge’s case to be decided by federal court than the risk of duplicate litigation and termination. inconsistent results.

But Nessel said the “excessive action” violates a federal rule that transfers from one court to another must be done within 30 days of the first filing.

The story continues below the ad

“We will tackle this blatant attempt to undermine that process in court and remain fervently committed to the belief that the fate of Michigan’s greatest natural resources should be determined,” Nessel said. in a Michigan court.

Enbridge’s Gambit is the latest turning point in a years-long political and legal battle over Route 5, a route that transports some 87 million liters of crude oil and natural gas liquids daily between Superior, Wis. And Sarnia, Ont.

It passes through northern Wisconsin and Michigan’s Upper Peninsula and is part of the Enbridge network that transports Canadian crude oil to refineries in both countries.

A 6.4 km long section is divided into two pipelines that cross the bottom of Mackinac Strait, where Lake Michigan and Lake Huron meet. Environmental and indigenous groups say they are at risk of spills that could contaminate hundreds of kilometers of water and shorelines, while Enbridge says they have never leaked and are in good condition.

Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer ordered Enbridge in November 2020 to close the 68-year-old line, revoking the state’s 1953 mitigation agreement that allowed its placement in the strait. The Calgary-based company filed a federal lawsuit and ignored the Democratic governor’s May 12 closure deadline.

Nessel, who had sued in state court to enforce Whitmer’s order, urged Neff to return the case to state court. But last month, the judge ruled that the case was brought “correctly in federal court” because it raised issues “under consideration at the highest levels of government in this country.”

The story continues below the ad

READ MORE: Ottawa says

These include Canada’s reference to a 1977 treaty with the United States relating to oil shipments between the two countries and federal pipeline safety regulation, Neff said.

Whitmer and Nessel responded this month by dropping the 2020 lawsuit and refocusing attention on the 2019 lawsuit filed in Michigan’s Ingham County. It argued that 5th Street’s presence in the strait violated public trust and state environmental laws.

READ MORE: Line 5: Michigan rejects pipeline lawsuit, focuses on separate cases

The judge, James Jamo, scheduled a status hearing for January 7.

Enbridge said in a statement that the two cases are similar and belong to the same court. The company said federal law allows a defendant to refer a case from state court to federal court within 30 days of receiving “clear and certain information” that action may be taken. perform.

Neff’s November 16 ruling “provided solid information based on this and the case has now been dropped for further proceedings before federal district court,” the company said.

Nessel objected to Enbridge’s interpretation of the rules.

“Our residents deserve better than a company that seeks to profit from our natural resources while trying to evade legal scrutiny for their actions against our natural resources,” she said. their actions.

© 2021 The Associated Press Line 5: Enbridge seeks to decide oil pipeline lawsuit in US federal court

Bobby Allyn

USTimeToday is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Related Articles

Back to top button