News

Two lawyers argue against virus safety measures before Supreme Court takes on COVID

At least two of the state officials who argued against the Biden Administration’s federal vaccine regulation Friday were forced to appear remotely before the Supreme Court because they contracted COVID in the past. the past few days, the report said.

Ohio Attorney General Benjamin Flowers and Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill argued their case by phone on behalf of Republican state officials and business groups seeking to block two vaccine requests. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) application: one for employers of more than 100 people and the other for healthcare facilities of all sizes.

Other attorneys who adopted the Supreme Court’s strict COVID-19 guidelines were able to appear before the court, where only eight members were present, Reuters reported. Justice Sonia Sotomayor participated in the hearings remotely from her rooms, a court spokeswoman confirmed.

Everyone present must present a negative PCR test performed at the court-approved facility prior to entry and wear an N95 or KN95 mask upon entry. The public, normally allowed to attend oral debates, is also prohibited from entering the building.


Want to compile daily all the news and commentary that Salon has to offer? Sign up for our morning newsletter, Crash Course.


Many public health experts pointed to the irony of Friday’s proceedings: The processes that attendees followed were far more stringent than those required by the Biden Administration – and so far has been working to contain the outbreak.

Epidemiologist David Michaels: “Now, meeting in a safe, controlled environment, judges can well block OSHA requirements that employers protect workers from exposure to a deadly virus” Wrote for the Washington Post this week. “This irony illustrates a fundamental inequality that has been normalized to the point of being essentially invisible: Powerful people can choose to work safely, while workers are more vulnerable. wounded must continue to risk their lives to earn a living.”

The court has yet to announce a decision on one of Biden’s COVID safety rules, although reports suggest a conservative majority is likely to reject the Governing Body’s rules regarding employers. great use. It’s not clear what they will decide on the separate vaccine mandate for healthcare facilities – at least some judges are more open to this rule than the first, according to CNN.

Read more stories like these:

https://www.salon.com/2022/01/07/not-one–but-two–lawyers-arguing-against-safety-measures-before-get/ Two lawyers argue against virus safety measures before Supreme Court takes on COVID

Huynh Nguyen

USTimeToday is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – admin@ustimetoday.com. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Related Articles

Back to top button