Michael Flynn’s legal battle to avoid the January 6 investigation is shot down by a judge a day after the lawsuit was filed

On Wednesday, a judge dismissed former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn’s lawsuit against the House Select Committee investigating the January 6 attacks, arguing that Flynn probably won’t face charges. with “immediate and irreparable harm” from a federal investigation.

In November, Flynn was one of six Donald Trump allies subpoenaed for his apparent connections to various Trump allies before the January 6 uprising. On Tuesday , Flynn filed a lawsuit against the jury asking for a temporary restraining order, seeking to prevent the commission from accessing his phone records or subpoenaing him for testimony.

“Like many Americans at the end of 2020, and to this day, General Flynn has sincerely expressed concern about the integrity of the 2020 election. It is not a crime to hold such beliefs. , regardless of whether they are true or false,” his complaint reads at the time. Flynn has widely argued that the committee’s investigation violates the Fifth Amendment’s right against self-incrimination.

RELATED: Most damn Mark Meadows messages are sent from Rick Perry’s phone: report

The panel was particularly interested in a White House meeting that Flynn attended in mid-December, in which many conspiracy theories surrounding the 2020 election were shared among Trump administration officials, according to the report. New York Times.

Wednesday’s ruling was delivered by U.S. Judge Mary Scriven, of Tampa, Florida, who indicated that Flynn’s case did not meet the procedural criteria for an injunction. “There is no basis to conclude that Flynn will face immediate and irreparable harm,” she said. Under federal law, claimants need to notify other parties of their intent to seek an injunction before filing — a requirement that Flynn’s legal team failed to meet, according to federal law. NBC News.

Want to compile daily all the news and commentary that Salon has to offer? Sign up for our morning newsletter, Crash Course.

Scriven said that Flynn could resubmit the restraining order “if he believes he can comply with the procedural requirements.”

Although Flynn’s first counterattack against the panel on January 6 failed, it remains unclear when the former Trump adviser is expected to purchase the documents requested as part of the subpoena. his November court. The original document deadline was set for late November, but that deadline has passed.

RELATED: The January 6 committee does not participate in the GOP . MPs

Following the ruling, Flynn’s attorney, David Warrington, said that Scriven acknowledged the potential for harm to Flynn if the committee expedited their document deadline. “A new movement for [temporary restraining order]”Warrington said, in that case,” might be appropriate. “

Flynn’s lawsuit comes as the committee continues not to interfere with a number of Trump allies, including former Trump adviser Steve Bannon and Mark Meadows, Trump’s chief of staff – both of which have been impeached. contempt of Congress. Other current and former officials under surveillance include former DOJ officials Jeffrey Clark and Kashyap Patel, as well as Representatives Jim Jordan, R-Ohio and Scott Perry, R-Pa. Michael Flynn’s legal battle to avoid the January 6 investigation is shot down by a judge a day after the lawsuit was filed

Huynh Nguyen

USTimeToday is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Related Articles

Back to top button