A California city has passed a law that requires gun owners to have insurance and pay a $25 annual fee.
“Certainly, the Second Amendment protects every citizen’s right to own a gun. San Jose Democratic Mayor Sam Liccardo said, according to CNN.
By law, gun owners are also required to have insurance. The law, which received its first approval in January, will need approval for a second reading this month before it can be put into the books, effective in August.
Even before the second reading, a lawsuit was filed to stop the process.
“We have opposed this ordinance step by step and we will look at this to the end,” said Dudley Brown, president of the National Association for Gun Rights and executive director of the National Foundation for Gun Rights. with CNN before January. . 25 votes allowed the law to initially approve in Silicon Valley City.
“If the San Jose City Council does indeed vote to impose this absurd constitutional tax on gun ownership, then our message is clear and simple: see you in court.” Brown said.
The National Gun Rights Association just sued the City of San Jose (@pnjaban is one of the plaintiffs’ attorneys), alleging that the city’s new firearms charges and liability insurance requirements violate constitutional law.https://t.co/fW8dAkH3hu pic.twitter.com/mWz2u7NeLC
– Cyrus Farivar (@cfarivar) January 26, 2022
San Jose, California asserts that it is “constitutional” in requiring gun owners to purchase liability insurance and pay an “annual gun harm reduction fee” in order to exercise their right to specific protections by law. Second Amendment.https://t.co/yGQhD0mR9i
– reason (@reason) February 5, 2022
Even in one gun control status like California, it’s a law that can go too far.
In an interview with SlateLiccardo says that “when people become aware of the fact that, ‘hey, whether you own a gun or not, you’re actually paying for this,’ people start thinking, better,” do How can we better distribute the cost of gun ownership and its harm?’”
Liccardo said gun owners “may not report guns to insurance companies like they should.”
“When you notify the insurance company, the insurance company can start asking questions like, ‘do you have a gun safe? Do you have an activation key? Have you taken gun safety classes? ‘ And those actions can help reduce premiums for insureds, just as motorists get a discount for safe drivers on our premiums,” he said.
Is this just another sneaky way to try to keep guns out of the hands of law-abiding citizens?
Yes: 100% (610 Votes)
No: 0% (1 Vote)
Gun owners who fail to pay the fee will face a fine, but they will not be criminally charged, he said. However, he said, they could have their guns confiscated and illustrate a possible scenario.
“Caught people with guns, on the street, in bars and nightclubs – you can imagine a bunch of different places where a cop would really like to have the ability to remove a gun from a flammable situation. . For example, there was a fight in the bar and they were patting everyone and someone had a gun. ‘Did you pay the fee? Do you have insurance? ‘ ‘Is not.’
“Okay, there’s our chance to unload our guns. And then when the gun owner comes back and proves that they’re abiding by the law and that they’re the legal gun owner, they’ll get their guns back. But in the meantime, you pulled your gun out of a bar brawl. And that’s not a bad thing,” he said.
Liccardo insists the fee is legitimate.
“The fact that there is a constitutional right attached somewhere to the performance of a particular activity does not mean that the right cannot be administered, taxed or charged. The press pays taxes, even though it is an important First Amendment right. ‘ he told Slate.
Fees are hardly a burden, he said.
“Given the fact that buying a gun in this country costs hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars, depending on the model you choose, the $25 fee is probably not that terrible, I think. . Nor is it insurance, which can be obtained for little or no extra cost,” he said.
The fee will go to a nonprofit that not even Liccardo can clarify.
Its board of directors “will include many people, including, for example, Stanford professors, an epidemiologist who has focused on gun harm, and nonprofit experts who understand,” he said. domestic violence and suicide prevention programs.
“We invited and at least one member of a gun group actually joined the effort to start this nonprofit, because we wanted organizations that represent gun owners to be at the table. , help us understand, how do we best communicate, how do we best invest? And overwhelmingly, under the ordinance, these dollars will serve occupants of gun-owning households or significant other people who have relationships with gun owners,” he said.
https://www.westernjournal.com/mayor-plans-seize-guns-citizens-havent-paid-fee-exercise-2nd-amendment-rights/ Mayor plans to seize guns from citizens who haven’t paid ‘fees’ to exercise their 2nd Amendment rights